Math Problem Statement
The Jarrow-Rudd model (aka, the lognormal binomial tree) is a binomial tree in which the up and down factors are defned as follows u = e ! r− σ2 2 " h+σ √h , d = e ! r− σ2 2 " h−σ √h , where • r stands for the continuously-compounded, risk-free interest rate, • δ is the stock’s dividend yield, • σ denotes the volatility parameter, and • h stands for the length of a single period in a tree. Answer the following questions: a. (2 points) What is the ratio Su/Sd? b. (2 points) What is the (as simplifed as possible) expression for the risk-neutral probability of the stock price going up in a single step? c. (5 points) As was the case with the forward tree, the no-arbitrage condition for the binomial asset pricing model is satisfed for the Jarrow-Rudd tree regardless of the specifc values of σ, δ, r and h. True or false?
Solution
To answer these questions on the Jarrow-Rudd model, let's go through each question systematically.
Question (a)
To find the ratio , where:
- and
The ratio is:
Now substitute the expressions for and :
Since both terms share the base , we can combine them as:
Simplifying, we get:
Thus,
Question (b)
The risk-neutral probability of the stock price going up in a single step in the binomial model is given by the formula:
Substituting and , we proceed to simplify the expression.
Since , it can be simplified as:
Using the identity , we get:
Then,
After simplifying, we find that depends on , and remains in terms of -based expressions.
Question (c)
True or False: "As was the case with the forward tree, the no-arbitrage condition for the binomial asset pricing model is satisfied for the Jarrow-Rudd tree regardless of the specific values of , , , and ."
Answer: True.
In the Jarrow-Rudd model, the no-arbitrage condition is inherently satisfied by the construction of and , ensuring that the stock price will align with the risk-neutral valuation framework, regardless of the values of , , , and .
Would you like more details on any part of these explanations or need further clarification? Here are some related questions that might also interest you:
- How does the Jarrow-Rudd model differ from the Cox-Ross-Rubinstein (CRR) model in terms of up and down factors?
- Why is it essential for the no-arbitrage condition to hold in binomial tree models?
- What role does the dividend yield play in adjusting the risk-neutral probability?
- Can we apply the Jarrow-Rudd model to options with dividends, and if so, how?
- How does the period length influence the accuracy of the model in approximating continuous stock price movements?
Tip: When working with binomial trees, always check if the model requires adjustments for dividends to maintain accurate risk-neutral probabilities.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Financial Mathematics
Binomial Tree Model
Risk-neutral Probability
No-arbitrage Condition
Formulas
Up factor (u) = e^((r − σ^2/2) h + σ√h)
Down factor (d) = e^((r − σ^2/2) h − σ√h)
Risk-neutral probability (p) = (e^((r - δ) h) - d) / (u - d)
Ratio Su/Sd = e^(2σ√h)
Theorems
No-arbitrage Principle
Risk-neutral Valuation
Suitable Grade Level
Undergraduate level (Finance/Mathematics)
Related Recommendation
Jarrow-Rudd Model: Calculating Su/Sd Ratio and Risk-Neutral Probability
Binomial Tree Model: State Price Deflator and Non-standard Option Pricing
Three-Month $122-Strike Put Option Pricing Using a Forward Binomial Tree
Solve Problem 13-1: Binomial Model for Option Pricing with Risk-Free Rate
Options Pricing Using a Forward Binomial Tree - Example Problem and Solution