for 3(e^(4t)-1)/(e^(4t)+3), Use Improved Euler’s method with n=8 steps to approximate the solution to the initial-value problem over the time interval 0 is less than or equal to t is less than or equal to 5. fully solve

To solve this initial value problem using the **Improved Euler's Method** (also known as Heun's method), we follow a step-by-step approach. Let's assume the equation is \( y' = \frac{3(e^{4t}-1)}{e^{4t}+3} \) with the initial condition \( y(0) = y_0 \) (we'll proceed assuming an initial value \( y(0) \), which should be given explicitly, or if not, we can assign it later).

Here’s how to solve the problem:

### Step 1: Define the Problem and Equation
The problem is to approximate the solution to the differential equation:

\[
y' = f(t, y) = \frac{3(e^{4t}-1)}{e^{4t}+3}
\]

over the time interval \( t \in [0, 5] \) using \( n = 8 \) steps.

The time step size \( h \) can be calculated as:

\[
h = \frac{t_{\text{final}} - t_{\text{initial}}}{n} = \frac{5 - 0}{8} = 0.625
\]

### Step 2: The Improved Euler’s Method (Heun’s Method)

The formula for the Improved Euler method for each step is given by:

\[
y_{n+1} = y_n + \frac{h}{2} \left[ f(t_n, y_n) + f\left(t_n + h, y_n + h f(t_n, y_n)\right) \right]
\]

This method takes the average of the slope at the current point \( (t_n, y_n) \) and an estimate at \( (t_n + h, y_n + h f(t_n, y_n)) \).

### Step 3: Iteration Process

We will iterate from \( t_0 = 0 \) to \( t_8 = 5 \) in 8 steps with a step size of \( h = 0.625 \).

Let’s go step-by-step to compute the values of \( y(t) \) at each point. First, I will calculate the values using the formula above for each step.

#### Step 3.1: Initial Condition
At \( t_0 = 0 \), we are given \( y(0) = y_0 \). Let’s proceed with that.

#### Step 3.2: Apply Heun's Method
For each step, we calculate the next value of \( y_{n+1} \) using the Improved Euler's formula. I'll carry out the calculations and show the progression for each step below:

1. **Step 0 (Initial point)**: \( t_0 = 0 \), \( y_0 = y(0) \) (assumed or given initial condition).
2. **Step 1**: \( t_1 = 0.625 \)
3. **Step 2**: \( t_2 = 1.25 \)
4. **Step 3**: \( t_3 = 1.875 \)
5. **Step 4**: \( t_4 = 2.5 \)
6. **Step 5**: \( t_5 = 3.125 \)
7. **Step 6**: \( t_6 = 3.75 \)
8. **Step 7**: \( t_7 = 4.375 \)
9. **Step 8**: \( t_8 = 5.0 \)

I will now compute the exact \( y(t_n) \) values numerically using Python for better precision.

Let me do the calculations:The solution using Improved Euler's method with \( n = 8 \) steps gives the following approximate values of \( y(t) \) at the specified time points:

- \( y(0.00) = 0.000 \)
- \( y(0.625) = 0.691 \)
- \( y(1.25) = 2.294 \)
- \( y(1.875) = 4.142 \)
- \( y(2.5) = 6.015 \)
- \( y(3.125) = 7.889 \)
- \( y(3.75) = 9.764 \)
- \( y(4.375) = 11.639 \)
- \( y(5.00) = 13.514 \)

Thus, at \( t = 5 \), the approximate value of \( y(5) \) is 13.514 using this method.

Would you like more details on any of these calculations or steps?

Here are some follow-up questions that could expand your understanding:
1. How does the Improved Euler's method compare with the standard Euler's method?
2. What is the effect of increasing or decreasing the step size \( h \)?
3. How does the behavior of \( y(t) \) change as \( t \) increases?
4. Can we apply this method to more complex or nonlinear systems?
5. How accurate is the solution if we use more steps?

**Tip**: The Improved Euler's method is much more accurate than the basic Euler method because it averages the slope at two points, reducing error in each step.

Learn how to solve the differential equation y' = 3(e^(4t)-1)/(e^(4t)+3) using the Improved Euler’s method with 8 steps. This example walks through the numerical method step-by-step, showing how to approximate the solution over the interval t = [0, 5] with a step size of 0.625. Ideal for students in undergraduate calculus or numerical analysis courses.

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation