Using the expression for tanh(2x):
tanh(2x)=e2x+e−2xe2x−e−2x,
the numerator 1+tanh(2x) becomes:
1+tanh(2x)=1+e2x+e−2xe2x−e−2x=e2x+e−2x(e2x+e−2x)+(e2x−e−2x)=e2x+e−2x2e2x.
Similarly, the denominator 1−tanh(2x) becomes:
1−tanh(2x)=1−e2x+e−2xe2x−e−2x=e2x+e−2x(e2x+e−2x)−(e2x−e−2x)=e2x+e−2x2e−2x.
The fraction 1−tanh(2x)1+tanh(2x) is then:
1−tanh(2x)1+tanh(2x)=e2x+e−2x2e−2xe2x+e−2x2e2x=2e−2x2e2x=e4x.
Taking the natural logarithm:
ln(1−tanh(2x)1+tanh(2x))=ln(e4x)=4x.
This completes the proof.
Would you like additional details or have any questions? Here are 5 related questions for deeper exploration:
What are the definitions of other hyperbolic functions, such as sinh(x) and cosh(x)?
How does tanh(x) behave asymptotically as x→∞?
Can you derive similar logarithmic identities for other hyperbolic functions?
How can hyperbolic functions be applied to solve real-world problems in physics or engineering?
How does the relationship between tanh(2x) and e2x connect to complex exponentials?
Tip: Always verify logarithmic identities by rewriting the terms into their exponential equivalents—it often simplifies the work.