Math Problem Statement

Consider the “divides” relation on each of the following sets A. Draw the Hasse diagram for each relation. b. A 5 {2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18}

Solution

To create the Hasse diagram for the "divides" relation on the set A={2,3,4,6,8,9,12,18}A = \{2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18\}, we need to consider the partial order induced by the divides relation. In this relation, aba \leq b if and only if aa divides bb (written as aba \mid b).

Steps to Build the Hasse Diagram

  1. Identify All Relations: For each pair (a,b)(a, b) in AA, determine if aba \mid b.

  2. Remove Transitive Edges: In a Hasse diagram, we exclude edges that can be inferred by transitivity to simplify the structure. For example, if aba \mid b and bcb \mid c, then we exclude aca \mid c directly.

  3. Draw the Diagram: Place each element of AA as a vertex. Connect vertices with lines only if one element directly divides another without any intermediary.

Analysis of Relations

  1. Starting with Smallest Elements:

    • 22: Divides 4,6,8,12,4, 6, 8, 12, and 1818.
    • 33: Divides 6,9,6, 9, and 1818.
  2. Building on Larger Elements:

    • 44: Divides 88 and 1212.
    • 66: Divides 1212 and 1818.
    • 88: Does not divide any larger elements within AA.
    • 99: Divides 1818.
    • 1212 and 1818: Are the largest elements in AA for this relation.

Resulting Hasse Diagram

The Hasse diagram will have the following structure:

  • Bottom Layer: 22 and 33, as they divide other numbers.
  • Middle Layers:
    • First Level from Bottom: 44, 66, 88, and 99.
    • Second Level: 1212 and 1818.
  • Top Layer: None, as 1818 and 1212 are the largest in the set.

Here’s the basic structure for the Hasse Diagram based on the given relation:

           18
          /   \
         6     9
        / \    |
       2   4   3
      / \   \ / 
     12    8  

Would you like a more detailed, step-by-step explanation or a specific layout in graph form?

Related Questions

  1. How would the Hasse diagram change if we included 1 in the set?
  2. What is the significance of transitive relations in a Hasse diagram?
  3. Can we extend this concept to other types of divisibility relations, such as modulo relationships?
  4. How would the diagram differ if we considered a different partial order, such as "greater than"?
  5. Why is the divides relation useful in understanding number structure?

Tip:

Always remove transitive edges in Hasse diagrams to simplify and focus on direct relationships.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Set Theory
Relations
Hasse Diagram
Partial Order

Formulas

Divides relation (a | b)

Theorems

Partial Order and Poset Theory

Suitable Grade Level

Grades 10-12