Math Problem Statement
Let f(x) = 1 2 ∥Ax−b∥2 +∥x∥2 where the norm is the euclidean norm and A ∈ R3×4, b ∈ R3 is defined as: A = 3 2 0 −1 −1 3 0 2 0 −4 −2 7 , b = 3 1 −4 Find the gradient of f at x = [x1, x2, x3, x4]T . Without actually finding the value or values of x at which the gradient of f is 0, can we say whether it will be unique or not? Justify.
Solution
The given problem is about finding the gradient of a function and determining if the solution to will be unique.
Problem Statement Recap:
Let , where and . The matrices and are defined as:
We need to find the gradient of with respect to and determine whether the solution to will be unique.
Step 1: Finding the Gradient
The function can be written as:
Using the Euclidean norm properties, we have:
Thus, becomes:
The gradient of with respect to is:
Step 2: Analyzing Uniqueness of Solution
To check whether the solution to is unique, we rewrite the condition for optimality:
This can be rearranged as:
Here, is the identity matrix. The uniqueness of the solution depends on whether is invertible. For to be invertible, it must be a positive definite matrix.
- is a matrix, and adding makes it positive definite, since adding a positive definite matrix to a positive semi-definite matrix results in a positive definite matrix.
- A positive definite matrix is always invertible.
Thus, being positive definite implies it is invertible. Therefore, the solution to the equation will be unique.
Conclusion
Without finding the actual values of , we can conclude that the solution to is unique because the matrix is positive definite and hence invertible.
Do you want more details or have any questions?
Here are five related questions that expand on the previous information:
- What are the eigenvalues of the matrix , and how do they relate to the matrix's positive definiteness?
- Can we explicitly compute the solution using the normal equations derived?
- How does the dimensionality of (being ) affect the solution space of in general?
- What would change if were a square matrix (i.e., instead of )?
- How would the problem formulation and solution change if we used a different norm (e.g., norm) instead of the Euclidean norm?
Tip: When dealing with optimization problems, checking the positive definiteness of the Hessian matrix or its equivalent ensures that the problem has a unique minimum and that any solution found is stable.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Matrix Calculus
Optimization
Positive Definite Matrices
Formulas
Gradient formula
Euclidean norm properties
Theorems
Positive Definite Matrix Theorem
Suitable Grade Level
Advanced Mathematics
Related Recommendation
Gradient of Quadratic Function f(x) = 1/2 ||Ax - b||^2 + ||x||^2
Gradient of Quadratic Function with Convex Optimization
Gradient Descent for Quadratic Function Minimization
Optimization Issue: Curvature Condition Fails Near Optimal Point with Small Gradient Norm
Gradient of Quadratic Function f(x) with Matrix A and Vector b