Math Problem Statement

Predict the distance fallen in a free-fall experiment after 0.68 seconds based on given time-distance data. The user provided a table of time (s) and distance (cm), along with questions involving scatterplots, transformations, and predictions based on regression models.

Solution

You've uploaded an image of a quiz sheet concerning free-fall distance data, specifically involving the relationship between time since release and distance fallen. From your image, it seems you need help with a part of the quiz that involves predicting the distance an object falls using a mathematical model based on time.

Given that the distance an object falls from rest in a gravitational field without resistance is proportional to the square of the time elapsed, d=12gt2d = \frac{1}{2}gt^2 where gg is the acceleration due to gravity, you would first plot this relationship, then fit a quadratic regression model to estimate parameters that match your data.

However, you also mention needing to transform the data to achieve linearity. This suggests using the transformation dd versus t2t^2, which linearizes the quadratic relationship, making it suitable for linear regression.

From your quiz question:

  1. Scatterplot – The scatterplot for dd versus tt is shown and it should display a quadratic curve upward, indicating a positive and strong relationship.
  2. Transformation – Since the distance fallen dd is proportional to the square of time t2t^2, this transformation will make the plot linear.
  3. Model Quality – The quality can be commented upon by looking at the residual plot and calculating the coefficient of determination r2r^2, where a higher r2r^2 value close to 1 indicates a good fit.
  4. Prediction – To predict the distance at 0.68 seconds, using the model d=12gt2d = \frac{1}{2}gt^2 you might need to estimate gg based on your regression model and calculate dd.

You've written "0.17245" at the end of the quiz image, which appears to be your prediction for part (d). However, this looks like a very small value. If you meant to calculate the distance, we should instead predict a much larger distance. For instance, with g9.8m/s2g \approx 9.8 \, \text{m/s}^2 and converting units properly, we would expect a much larger number.

Would you like me to assist with recalculating the predicted distance or help with any other specific question on the quiz?

Related questions you may be interested in:

  1. How can you determine the acceleration due to gravity gg from your data set?
  2. What transformations other than squaring time might be appropriate for this type of data analysis?
  3. How does the inclusion of air resistance affect the theoretical model for free-fall distance?
  4. What are the implications of a low r2r^2 value in your regression model?
  5. How do you interpret a residual plot in the context of model accuracy?

Tip: When dealing with physics data involving quadratic relationships, always consider transformations that linearize the data for simpler analysis and model fitting.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Two-Variable Data
Quadratic Regression
Linearization
Residual Analysis

Formulas

d = 1/2 * g * t^2
Quadratic Equation Transformation: y = a*t^2 + b

Theorems

Linear Regression Theory
Residual Plot Analysis
Coefficient of Determination (r^2)

Suitable Grade Level

Grades 10-12