Math Problem Statement

IJNN THEIS EXAMPLE EXO HOW WE TAKE FN AND GN OR IMBIGIOUS

Assuming that f1(n) is O(g1(n)) and f2(n) is O(g2(n)), disprove the following statements by providing counterexamples: a. f1(n) - f2(n) is O(g1(n) - g2(n)). b. f1(n)/f2(n) is O(g1(n)/g2(n)).

Solution

The exercise you're asking about concerns disproving two mathematical statements involving the Big-O notation by providing counterexamples. The problem is structured as follows:

Given:

  • f1(n)=O(g1(n))f_1(n) = O(g_1(n)) and
  • f2(n)=O(g2(n))f_2(n) = O(g_2(n)),

You are asked to disprove the following statements:

a. f1(n)f2(n)f_1(n) - f_2(n) is O(g1(n)g2(n))O(g_1(n) - g_2(n)).

b. f1(n)f2(n)\frac{f_1(n)}{f_2(n)} is O(g1(n)g2(n))O\left(\frac{g_1(n)}{g_2(n)}\right).

Disproving by Counterexample:

Part a:

We want to find an example where f1(n)f2(n)f_1(n) - f_2(n) is not bounded by O(g1(n)g2(n))O(g_1(n) - g_2(n)).

Consider the following counterexample:

  • Let f1(n)=n2+1f_1(n) = n^2 + 1, f2(n)=n2f_2(n) = n^2,
  • Let g1(n)=n2+ng_1(n) = n^2 + n, g2(n)=ng_2(n) = n.

Both f1(n)=O(g1(n))f_1(n) = O(g_1(n)) and f2(n)=O(g2(n))f_2(n) = O(g_2(n)) are true:

  • f1(n)=n2+1=O(n2+n)f_1(n) = n^2 + 1 = O(n^2 + n),
  • f2(n)=n2=O(n)f_2(n) = n^2 = O(n).

However:

  • f1(n)f2(n)=(n2+1)n2=1f_1(n) - f_2(n) = (n^2 + 1) - n^2 = 1, which is a constant,
  • g1(n)g2(n)=(n2+n)n=n2g_1(n) - g_2(n) = (n^2 + n) - n = n^2.

Clearly, 11 is not O(n2)O(n^2). Thus, this provides a counterexample, disproving the first statement.

Part b:

We need to find an example where f1(n)f2(n)\frac{f_1(n)}{f_2(n)} is not bounded by O(g1(n)g2(n))O\left(\frac{g_1(n)}{g_2(n)}\right).

Consider this counterexample:

  • Let f1(n)=n2f_1(n) = n^2, f2(n)=nf_2(n) = n,
  • Let g1(n)=n2g_1(n) = n^2, g2(n)=n2g_2(n) = n^2.

Here, both f1(n)=O(g1(n))f_1(n) = O(g_1(n)) and f2(n)=O(g2(n))f_2(n) = O(g_2(n)) hold:

  • f1(n)=n2=O(n2)f_1(n) = n^2 = O(n^2),
  • f2(n)=n=O(n2)f_2(n) = n = O(n^2).

However:

  • f1(n)f2(n)=n2n=n\frac{f_1(n)}{f_2(n)} = \frac{n^2}{n} = n,
  • g1(n)g2(n)=n2n2=1\frac{g_1(n)}{g_2(n)} = \frac{n^2}{n^2} = 1.

Clearly, nn is not O(1)O(1), disproving the second statement as well.

These two examples disprove both statements by showing cases where the Big-O relation does not hold.


Do you need further details or have questions? Here are some related questions for further exploration:

  1. How does Big-O notation compare growth rates of functions?
  2. What are typical functions used in Big-O notation analysis (e.g., polynomials, logarithmic, exponential)?
  3. What is the meaning of asymptotic upper bounds in Big-O notation?
  4. Can we have a function that is both O(g(n))O(g(n)) and O(h(n))O(h(n)) where g(n)h(n)g(n) \neq h(n)?
  5. How does Big-Ω\Omega and Big-Θ\Theta notation differ from Big-O?

Tip: When disproving statements in Big-O notation, always try to come up with edge cases (e.g., constants, powers) to test whether the assumptions hold.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Big-O Notation
Asymptotic Analysis
Growth Rate Comparison

Formulas

f1(n) - f2(n) = O(g1(n) - g2(n))
f1(n) / f2(n) = O(g1(n) / g2(n))

Theorems

Big-O Notation Rules

Suitable Grade Level

University Level - Algorithms and Complexity Theory