Math Problem Statement
Which of these relations on {0*,* 1*,* 2*,* 3} are partial order-
ings? Determine the properties of a partial ordering that
the others lack.
a) {(0*,* 0), (2*,* 2), (3*,* 3)}
b) {(0*,* 0), (1*,* 1), (2*,* 0), (2*,* 2), (2*,* 3), (3*,* 3)}
c) {(0*,* 0), (1*,* 1), (1*,* 2), (2*,* 2), (3*,* 1), (3*,* 3)}
d) {(0*,* 0), (1*,* 1), (1*,* 2), (1*,* 3), (2*,* 0), (2*,* 2), (2*,* 3),
(3*,* 0), (3*,* 3)}
e) {(0*,* 0), (0*,* 1), (0*,* 2), (0*,* 3), (1*,* 0), (1*,* 1), (1*,* 2),
(1*,* 3), (2*,* 0), (2*,* 2), (3*,* 3)}
Solution
To determine whether each relation is a partial ordering, we need to check if the relation is:
- Reflexive: Every element is related to itself, i.e., is in the relation for every in the set.
- Antisymmetric: If and are in the relation, then .
- Transitive: If and are in the relation, then must also be in the relation.
The set in question is . Let's evaluate each relation.
a)
- Reflexive: Not reflexive because is missing.
- Antisymmetric: Yes, all pairs are of the form , so antisymmetry holds trivially.
- Transitive: Yes, since there are no pairs like and for , transitivity holds trivially.
Conclusion: This is not a partial ordering because it is not reflexive.
b)
- Reflexive: Not reflexive because is present but is missing.
- Antisymmetric: Yes, antisymmetry holds trivially_ans_parser
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Set Theory
Relations
Partial Orders
Formulas
-
Theorems
Properties of Partial Orders: Reflexive, Antisymmetric, Transitive
Suitable Grade Level
Undergraduate Level (Discrete Mathematics)
Related Recommendation
Proof of Partial Order on A × B with Reflexivity, Antisymmetry, and Transitivity
Partial Orders, Cartesian Product, and Equivalence Relations - Advanced Algebra Task
Strict and Weak Partial Orders on Set {a, b, c}
Analyzing Relations on a Set for Reflexive, Symmetric, Antisymmetric, and Transitive Properties
Partial Order Relation: Proving x ≥ y on Positive Integers