The statement makes sense. Here's why:

• Meters vs. Yards: 1 meter is approximately 1.09361 yards. Therefore, 2000 meters is longer than 2000 yards.

• Conversion: If you convert 2000 meters to yards, it would be: $2000 \, \text{meters} \times 1.09361 = 2187.22 \, \text{yards}$ So, 2000 meters is approximately 2187.22 yards, which is longer than 2000 yards.

• Speed Comparison: Since you ran a longer distance (2187.22 yards) compared to the other person who ran 2000 yards in the same amount of time, you must have been running at a faster rate to cover the greater distance.

Thus, the statement is correct: you ran at a faster rate because you covered a greater distance (2000 meters vs. 2000 yards) in the same amount of time.

---

Do you have any questions, or would you like further details?

Here are 5 related questions for deeper understanding:

1. How would you calculate the rate of running if the time taken was 10 minutes?
2. How do you convert meters per second to miles per hour?
3. What is the ratio of the distances between meters and yards?
4. How much time would you save if you ran the same distance at the same rate but for 1600 meters?
5. How does converting units affect speed calculations in other sports like swimming?

Tip: Always ensure unit consistency when comparing distances or speeds across different measurement systems.