Math Problem Statement
Cloud seeding has been studied for many decades as a weather modification procedure (for an interesting study of this subject, see the article in Technometrics, “A Bayesian Analysis of a Multiplicative Treatment Effect in Weather Modification,” 1975, Vol. 17, pp. 161–166). The rainfall in acre-feet from 20 clouds that were selected at random and seeded with silver nitrate follows: 18.0, 30.7, 19.8, 27.1, 22.3, 18.8, 31.8, 23.4, 21.2, 27.9, 31.9, 27.1, 25.0, 24.7, 26.9, 21.8, 29.2, 34.8, 26.7, 31.6. (a) Is the rainfall is roughly normally distributed? (b) Can we support a claim that mean rainfall from seeded clouds exceeds 25 acre-feet? Use α = 0.05.
Solution
To analyze this problem, let's break it down into two main parts as stated:
Part (a): Checking Normality of Rainfall Data
To assess if the rainfall data is roughly normally distributed, we can use graphical methods (such as a histogram or a Q-Q plot) and statistical tests (like the Shapiro-Wilk test).
The rainfall data (in acre-feet) from the 20 clouds is:
Let's compute basic descriptive statistics:
- Mean (Sample Mean), : Average of the rainfall data.
- Standard Deviation, : Measures variability in rainfall.
These values can help us understand the central tendency and spread of the data.
To formally test normality, we can use the Shapiro-Wilk test:
- Null Hypothesis (): The data is normally distributed.
- Alternative Hypothesis (): The data is not normally distributed.
With the given data, this test would provide a p-value. If the p-value is greater than 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting the data could be considered normally distributed.
Part (b): Testing if Mean Rainfall from Seeded Clouds Exceeds 25 Acre-Feet
To test if the mean rainfall from seeded clouds exceeds 25 acre-feet, we set up a one-sample t-test since we are comparing the sample mean to a known value (25) and do not know the population standard deviation.
Hypotheses
- Null Hypothesis (): (The mean rainfall is 25 acre-feet)
- Alternative Hypothesis (): (The mean rainfall exceeds 25 acre-feet)
Test Statistic
The t-test statistic is calculated as:
where:
- is the sample mean,
- is the hypothesized mean (25),
- is the sample standard deviation,
- is the sample size (20).
Significance Level and Decision Rule
Using :
- If the p-value from the t-test is less than 0.05, we reject and conclude that the mean rainfall from seeded clouds likely exceeds 25 acre-feet.
- If the p-value is greater than 0.05, we fail to reject .
Would you like me to proceed with the calculations for the t-test and normality assessment using these values?
Here are five related questions to deepen understanding:
- How does the Shapiro-Wilk test specifically assess normality, and what are its limitations?
- Why do we use a one-sample t-test rather than a z-test in this context?
- What would be the implications if the data were not normally distributed?
- How would the results differ if we had a different significance level, such as ?
- What are some other weather modification techniques, and how is their effectiveness evaluated?
Tip: When conducting hypothesis tests, always check assumptions like normality to ensure the test's validity.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Descriptive Statistics
Hypothesis Testing
Normality Assessment
One-Sample t-Test
Formulas
Mean (\( \bar{x} \)) calculation formula: \( \bar{x} = \frac{\sum x}{n} \)
Standard deviation formula: \( s = \sqrt{\frac{\sum (x - \bar{x})^2}{n-1}} \)
t-test statistic formula: \( t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}} \)
Theorems
Central Limit Theorem
Shapiro-Wilk Test for Normality
Suitable Grade Level
Grades 11-12, Undergraduate
Related Recommendation
Understanding Normal Distribution: Annual Rainfall Example
Analyzing Rainfall Distribution: Histogram and Statistical Fit
Understanding Normal Distribution: Monthly Rainfall in City A with Mean 226 mm
Rainfall Data: Quartiles, IQR, and Outlier Detection for 20 Years of Data
Normal Distribution and Rainfall: Understanding the Empirical Rule