To prove the inequality $\chi(G) \leq 1 + \max\{\delta(H) : H \text{ is an induced subgraph of } G\}$, we proceed as follows:

---

Definitions:

1. Chromatic Number ($\chi(G)$): The minimum number of colors required to properly color the vertices of the graph $G$, such that no two adjacent vertices share the same color.

2. Minimum Degree ($\delta(H)$): The smallest degree of any vertex in the graph $H$.

3. Induced Subgraph: A subgraph $H$ of $G$ is called an induced subgraph if it contains some subset of the vertices of $G$ and all the edges between those vertices that exist in $G$.

---

Strategy:

The goal is to show that the chromatic number $\chi(G)$ of a simple graph $G$ is bounded above by $1 + \max\{\delta(H) : H \text{ is an induced subgraph of } G\}$.

1. Key Property of Coloring:

   • If a graph $G$ is $k$-colorable ($\chi(G) = k$), then the maximum degree of any vertex $v$ in $G$ must satisfy $k \geq \Delta(G) + 1$, where $\Delta(G)$ is the maximum degree of the graph.

2. We generalize this observation to consider induced subgraphs of $G$, which allow us to account for structural complexity across the graph.

---

Proof:

Step 1: Relation Between Chromatic Number and Degree

Suppose $H$ is any induced subgraph of $G$. For $H$, every vertex must have a degree of at most $\delta(H)$. Thus, it takes at most $\delta(H) + 1$ colors to properly color $H$.

Step 2: Chromatic Number of the Entire Graph

Since $H$ is an induced subgraph of $G$, the chromatic number of $G$ cannot exceed $\delta(H) + 1$ for any $H$. Formally, $\chi(G) \leq \max\{\delta(H) + 1 : H \text{ is an induced subgraph of } G\}.$

Step 3: Simplifying the Bound

Let $M = \max\{\delta(H) : H \text{ is an induced subgraph of } G\}$. Then the inequality becomes: $\chi(G) \leq 1 + M.$

Thus, the chromatic number of $G$ satisfies the required inequality: $\chi(G) \leq 1 + \max\{\delta(H) : H \text{ is an induced subgraph of } G\}.$

---

Conclusion:

We have shown that for any simple graph $G$, the chromatic number $\chi(G)$ is bounded above by $1 + \max\{\delta(H) : H \text{ is an induced subgraph of } G\}$.

---

Would you like a detailed example demonstrating this theorem? Let me know! 😊

---

Follow-Up Questions:

1. What is an example of a graph where this bound is tight?
2. How does this bound change for weighted graphs or multigraphs?
3. Can you explain how induced subgraphs impact the chromatic number more generally?
4. How does this relate to Brooks' theorem, which provides another bound for $\chi(G)$?
5. How can this be applied to specific graph families, like bipartite graphs or planar graphs?

Tip:

When solving problems involving chromatic numbers, always consider both the maximum degree and specific structural properties (e.g., induced subgraphs or cliques) for sharper bounds!