Math Problem Statement
Suppose � , � : � → � f,g:R→R are functions such that � g is differentiable at � x and � f is differentiable at � ( � ) g(x). Define � u and � v as in the proof of the chain rule that we gave in class, i.e.
� ( � )
{ � ( � ) − � ( � ) � − � − � ′ ( � ) if � ≠ � 0 if �
� u(t)={ t−x g(t)−g(x) −g ′ (x) 0
if t =x if t=x
and
� ( � )
{ � ( � ) − � ( � ( � ) ) � − � ( � ) − � ′ ( � ( � ) ) if � ≠ � ( � ) 0 if �
� ( � ) v(s)={ s−g(x) f(s)−f(g(x)) −f ′ (g(x)) 0
if s =g(x) if s=g(x)
Suppose that:
For all � t, ∣ � ( � ) ∣ ≤ ∣ � − � ∣ 2 ∣u(t)∣≤∣t−x∣ 2 . For all � s, ∣ � ( � ) ∣ ≤ 3 ∣ � − � ( � ) ∣ ∣v(s)∣≤3∣s−g(x)∣. For all � t, ∣ � ( � ) − � ( � ) ∣ ≤ ∣ � − � ∣ 3 ∣g(t)−g(x)∣≤∣t−x∣ 3 . � ′ ( � )
2 g ′ (x)=2 � ′ ( � ( � ) )
4 f ′ (g(x))=4 If ∣ � − � ∣ ≤ 0.1 ∣t−x∣≤0.1 then what can you say about ∣ � ( � ( � ) ) − � ( � ( � ) ) � − � − � ′ ( � ( � ) ) � ′ ( � ) ∣ ∣ t−x f(g(t))−f(g(x)) −f ′ (g(x))g ′ (x)∣?
∣ � ( � ( � ) ) − � ( � ( � ) ) � − � − � ′ ( � ( � ) ) � ′ ( � ) ∣ ≤ ∣ t−x f(g(t))−f(g(x)) −f ′ (g(x))g ′ (x)∣≤
Solution
To analyze this expression:
we'll use the functions and defined in the problem, as well as the inequalities provided.
Step-by-Step Solution:
-
Define :
For , Since is differentiable at , we expect that as , .Given Bound:
-
Define :
For , Since is differentiable at , we expect that as , .Given Bound:
-
Rewrite the Main Expression Using and :
We want to evaluate Expanding around and using the definition of , we get Let’s substitute: -
Expand and Simplify:
Expanding this product, Therefore, -
Apply the Given Bounds:
We know:- .
- .
- .
Using these bounds:
- .
- .
- .
-
Combine the Results:
Summing these, we get: For , higher powers of (like and ) become very small, so the dominant term here is .
Final Result:
Thus, for small , we can approximate:
Would you like further clarification on any part of this solution?
Related Questions to Explore:
- What would happen if or were zero?
- How would the result change if we altered the bounds on or ?
- Can we extend this method to other compositions of differentiable functions?
- What is the significance of each term in the expansion in Step 4?
- How does this result relate to the precise definition of the chain rule?
Tip:
In approximation problems, identifying the dominant term helps simplify analysis, especially when dealing with higher-order small quantities.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Calculus
Differentiation
Chain Rule
Function Limits
Formulas
u(t) = (g(t) - g(x)) / (t - x) - g'(x) if t ≠ x, 0 if t = x
v(s) = (f(s) - f(g(x))) / (s - g(x)) - f'(g(x)) if s ≠ g(x), 0 if s = g(x)
|f(g(t)) - f(g(x)) / (t - x) - f'(g(x))g'(x)|
Theorems
Chain Rule
Suitable Grade Level
Undergraduate Calculus
Related Recommendation
Derivative of Composite Functions u(x) = f(g(x)), v(x) = g(f(x)), w(x) = g(g(x))
Analyzing Derivatives of Composite Functions Using Graphs
Solve Derivatives Using Chain Rule for Composite Functions
Differentiation of Composite Functions in Matrix Form
Function Composition and Derivative Calculations for f(u) = u^2 + u and g(x) = cos(x)