Math Problem Statement

8. If (s_n) is a subsequence of (t_n) and (t_n) is a subsequence of (s_n), can we conclude that (s_n) = (t_n)? Prove or give a counterexample. 9. Let (s_n) be a bounded sequence and suppose that lim inf s_n = lim sup s_n = s. Prove that (s_n) is convergent and that lim s_n = s. 10. Suppose that x > 1. Prove that lim x^{1/n} = 1.

Solution

Let's go through each of the questions in the image one by one:

Problem 8:

If (sn)(s_n) is a subsequence of (tn)(t_n) and (tn)(t_n) is a subsequence of (sn)(s_n), can we conclude that (sn)=(tn)(s_n) = (t_n)? Prove or give a counterexample.

Solution:

We need to decide if two sequences that are subsequences of each other must be identical. A counterexample would disprove this claim.

Counterexample: Consider the sequence (sn)=(1)n(s_n) = (-1)^n, which alternates between 11 and 1-1. Now, define:

  • (tn)(t_n) as the subsequence of (sn)(s_n) where tn=s2n=1t_n = s_{2n} = 1 for all nn, i.e., it takes only the positive terms from (sn)(s_n).
  • (sn)(s_n) as the subsequence of (tn)(t_n), where sn=t2n=1s_n = t_{2n} = 1, i.e., it also only includes positive terms.

Even though both are subsequences of each other, they are not identical because one sequence consists of both 11 and 1-1, while the other only consists of 11.

Thus, no, we cannot conclude that (sn)=(tn)(s_n) = (t_n) if they are subsequences of each other.


Problem 9:

Let (sn)(s_n) be a bounded sequence and suppose that lim infsn=lim supsn=s\liminf s_n = \limsup s_n = s. Prove that (sn)(s_n) is convergent and that limsn=s\lim s_n = s.

Solution:

We are given that the sequence (sn)(s_n) is bounded, and lim infsn=lim supsn=s\liminf s_n = \limsup s_n = s. We want to prove that the sequence converges to ss.

  1. Boundedness: Since (sn)(s_n) is bounded, it means there exists some real numbers mm and MM such that msnMm \leq s_n \leq M for all nn.

  2. Equality of lim inf\liminf and lim sup\limsup: The limit inferior (lim infsn\liminf s_n) is the largest value such that any subsequence converging below it must converge to a limit smaller than or equal to this value. Similarly, the limit superior (lim supsn\limsup s_n) is the smallest value such that any subsequence converging above it must converge to a limit larger than or equal to it.

    Since lim infsn=lim supsn=s\liminf s_n = \limsup s_n = s, this implies that all subsequential limits must converge to ss. No subsequence can converge to anything other than ss, so the entire sequence must converge to ss.

Thus, (sn)(s_n) converges to ss.


Problem 10:

Suppose that x>1x > 1. Prove that limnx1/n=1\lim_{n \to \infty} x^{1/n} = 1.

Solution:

We need to prove that as nn \to \infty, x1/nx^{1/n} approaches 1 for any x>1x > 1.

  1. Rewrite x1/nx^{1/n} as exp(ln(x)n)\exp\left(\frac{\ln(x)}{n}\right).

  2. As nn \to \infty, the term ln(x)n\frac{\ln(x)}{n} approaches 0 because ln(x)\ln(x) is a constant and nn grows indefinitely.

  3. Therefore, exp(ln(x)n)\exp\left(\frac{\ln(x)}{n}\right) approaches exp(0)=1\exp(0) = 1.

Thus, we have limnx1/n=1\lim_{n \to \infty} x^{1/n} = 1.


Do you need further details or clarifications on any of these problems?

Follow-up Questions:

  1. What is the formal definition of a subsequence?
  2. Can you give another example where two subsequences are not equal?
  3. How does the definition of lim inf\liminf and lim sup\limsup help in proving convergence?
  4. What is the intuition behind the logarithmic approach in Problem 10?
  5. How does boundedness of a sequence guarantee the existence of subsequential limits?

Tip:

Always check if a counterexample exists when a statement seems overly general, as it can save time compared to attempting a direct proof.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Subsequences
Bounded Sequences
Limits
Convergence
Exponential Functions

Formulas

lim inf s_n = lim sup s_n = s
lim x^{1/n} = 1

Theorems

Subsequence Convergence Theorem
Squeeze Theorem

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate Mathematics