Math Problem Statement
If $f(n) = \theta(g(n))$ and $g(n)=\theta(h(n))$ then $h(n)=\theta(f(n))$
So, if we are saying that $f(n)$ has the property of:
$\exists \ c_1, c_2, n_0 \ \ \ s.t. \ \ \ c_1 \ \cdot f(n) \le g(n) \le c_2 \ \cdot f(n)$
Which implies that $g(n)$ is a function that both lower bounds $f(n)$ and upper bounds $f(n)$
Therefore, if $g(n)=\theta(h(n))$ then therefore:
$\exists \ d_1, d_2, n_0 \ \ \ s.t. \ \ \ d_1 \cdot \ g(n) \le h(n) \le d_2 \cdot g(n)$
So, h(n) is both the upper bound and lower bound of g(n).
We can form the final inequality, which implies:
So the = really means that the notation on the left hand side belongs into the set of functions in the theta formula, such that for the final one, h(n) is both lower bounding and upper bounding f(n)
$\exists \ e_1, e_2, n_0 > 0 \ s.t \ \forall n \ge n_0 \ | \ e_1 \cdot h(n) \le f(n) \ge e_2 \cdot h(n)$
If we expand that inequality by plugging in
I am confused exactly how to prove this?
Solution
You're working on proving that if and , then . This is a transitivity property of Big- notation. Let’s break down the proof clearly step by step.
Step-by-Step Proof:
-
Start with the definition of Big- for : By definition, we know that: This means that bounds from both below and above for all .
-
Now, consider : Similarly, by the definition of Big-, we know: This means that bounds from both below and above for all .
-
Combine the inequalities: To prove , we need to show that bounds from both below and above. This can be done by combining the two inequalities.
-
From , we know:
-
From , we know:
-
-
Substitute bounds for into the inequality for : By substituting the bounds on from the second inequality into the first inequality, we get: Simplifying:
-
Conclusion: The final inequality shows that there exist constants and such that: This is exactly the definition of .
Conclusion:
Thus, we've shown that if and , then . This proves the transitivity property of Big- notation.
Would you like any further details or clarifications?
Here are 5 related questions:
- How does Big- notation relate to Big-?
- Can you prove a similar result for Big- or Big- notation?
- What are some examples of functions where ?
- How does the transitivity property help in algorithm analysis?
- What are the limitations of Big- notation in asymptotic analysis?
Tip:
When proving relationships with asymptotic notations, always carefully track how constants combine during substitutions to maintain the correct bounds.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Asymptotic Notation
Big-Theta Notation
Algorithm Analysis
Formulas
$f(n) = \theta(g(n))$: $\exists c_1, c_2, n_0 \ s.t. \ c_1 \cdot g(n) \le f(n) \le c_2 \cdot g(n)$
$g(n) = \theta(h(n))$: $\exists d_1, d_2, n_0 \ s.t. \ d_1 \cdot h(n) \le g(n) \le d_2 \cdot h(n)$
Final result: $\exists e_1, e_2, n_0 \ s.t. \ e_1 \cdot h(n) \le f(n) \le e_2 \cdot h(n)$
Theorems
Transitivity of Big-Theta Notation
Suitable Grade Level
College-Level (Undergraduate Computer Science or Mathematics)
Related Recommendation
Asymptotic Analysis of f(x) = 3x^2 + x + 1: Proving Theta(x^2)
Prove that f(n) = 3n^3 + 7n + 10 ∈ θ(n^3)
Understanding Asymptotic Notations: f(n) = O(g(n)) and Its Implications
Proof for Inequalities with Increasing Functions and Composition
Understanding Asymptotic Notation: Theta Notation and Polynomial Growth