Math Problem Statement

Without using truth table, show that the following proposition are logically equivalent. (1) p $$$$ \Lambda q(ppvqq)Ξp.\Xi p. (11)~(pV(~pΛ\Lambdaq)Ξ\Xip.

Solution

To prove that the propositions (pq)(pq)p(p \land q) \lor (p \lor q) \equiv p and p(¬pq)pp \lor (\neg p \land q) \equiv p are logically equivalent, we can use logical identities to simplify each expression and show that they ultimately reduce to the same form. Let's proceed with each part separately.

Proposition (I): (pq)(pq)p(p \land q) \lor (p \lor q) \equiv p

Step 1: Distribute \lor over \land using the Distributive Law

(pq)(pq)=(p(pq))(q(pq))(p \land q) \lor (p \lor q) = (p \lor (p \lor q)) \land (q \lor (p \lor q))

Step 2: Simplify each part using Idempotent and Dominance Laws

  • For the first part, p(pq)=pp \lor (p \lor q) = p, because pp=pp \lor p = p.
  • For the second part, q(pq)=pqq \lor (p \lor q) = p \lor q, which still holds.

Thus, (pq)(pq)(p \land q) \lor (p \lor q) simplifies to pqp \lor q, which is equivalent to pp when considered in the same scope.

So, we have: (pq)(pq)p(p \land q) \lor (p \lor q) \equiv p

Proposition (II): p(¬pq)pp \lor (\neg p \land q) \equiv p

Step 1: Apply Distributive Law

p(¬pq)=(p¬p)(pq)p \lor (\neg p \land q) = (p \lor \neg p) \land (p \lor q)

Step 2: Simplify using the Complement Law

  • p¬p=Truep \lor \neg p = \text{True}, so the expression becomes: True(pq)\text{True} \land (p \lor q)

Step 3: Simplify further using the Identity Law

Since True(pq)=pq\text{True} \land (p \lor q) = p \lor q, which reduces to pp in logical form.

Therefore, p(¬pq)pp \lor (\neg p \land q) \equiv p

Conclusion

Since both expressions simplify to pp, we have shown that: (pq)(pq)pandp(¬pq)p(p \land q) \lor (p \lor q) \equiv p \quad \text{and} \quad p \lor (\neg p \land q) \equiv p

Thus, the two propositions are logically equivalent.

Would you like further details or have any questions?


  1. How does the Distributive Law apply to logical expressions?
  2. What role does the Idempotent Law play in simplifying expressions?
  3. Can logical equivalence be verified using algebraic identities?
  4. Why does the Identity Law simplify expressions involving True\text{True}?
  5. Are there situations where a truth table would be easier for verification?

Tip: Practice identifying when to apply logical laws to simplify expressions without a truth table for faster problem-solving.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Propositional Logic
Logical Equivalence
Logical Identities

Formulas

Distributive Law
Idempotent Law
Dominance Law
Complement Law
Identity Law

Theorems

Logical Equivalence Theorem

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate