Math Problem Statement

Let F be a field with Char(F) = 0, and T ∈ A_F(V) be such that tr(T^i) = 0 for all i ≥ 1. Prove that T is nilpotent.

Solution

To prove that TT is nilpotent under the given conditions, let's proceed with a detailed argument.


Problem Summary

We are tasked with proving that a linear operator TAF(V)T \in A_F(V) is nilpotent (i.e., Tm=0T^m = 0 for some positive integer mm) over a field FF with characteristic 0, under the condition that: tr(Ti)=0,for all i1.\text{tr}(T^i) = 0, \quad \text{for all } i \geq 1.


Proof

  1. Basic Definitions:

    • Since FF has characteristic 0, the trace function satisfies all properties of traces in a field of characteristic 0, particularly cyclic invariance: tr(AB)=tr(BA)\text{tr}(AB) = \text{tr}(BA) for any matrices A,BA, B.
    • The trace of a linear operator TT is the sum of its eigenvalues (counted with multiplicity).
  2. Trace Condition:

    • The condition tr(Ti)=0\text{tr}(T^i) = 0 for all i1i \geq 1 implies that for every ii, the sum of the eigenvalues of TiT^i is 0.
  3. Eigenvalues:

    • Let the eigenvalues of TT (over some algebraic closure of FF) be λ1,λ2,,λn\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n.
    • For any ii, the eigenvalues of TiT^i are λ1i,λ2i,,λni\lambda_1^i, \lambda_2^i, \ldots, \lambda_n^i. Thus, the condition tr(Ti)=0\text{tr}(T^i) = 0 implies: λ1i+λ2i++λni=0,i1.\lambda_1^i + \lambda_2^i + \cdots + \lambda_n^i = 0, \quad \forall i \geq 1.
  4. Vandermonde Argument:

    • Consider the eigenvalues λ1,λ2,,λn\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \ldots, \lambda_n. The conditions λ1i+λ2i++λni=0,i1,\lambda_1^i + \lambda_2^i + \cdots + \lambda_n^i = 0, \quad \forall i \geq 1, imply that all eigenvalues must be 0. This can be shown using the linear independence of power functions 1,x,x2,1, x, x^2, \ldots over C\mathbb{C} (or any algebraic closure of FF).

    • The trace conditions essentially form a Vandermonde system:

      1 & 1 & \cdots & 1 \\ \lambda_1 & \lambda_2 & \cdots & \lambda_n \\ \lambda_1^2 & \lambda_2^2 & \cdots & \lambda_n^2 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \lambda_1^{n-1} & \lambda_2^{n-1} & \cdots & \lambda_n^{n-1} \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ \vdots \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} = 0.$$ The only solution is $$\lambda_1 = \lambda_2 = \cdots = \lambda_n = 0$$.
  5. Nilpotency:

    • Since all eigenvalues of TT are zero, the minimal polynomial of TT must be of the form xmx^m, where mnm \leq n is the size of the vector space VV.
    • Thus, Tm=0T^m = 0, proving that TT is nilpotent.

Conclusion

The operator TT is nilpotent because the trace condition forces all eigenvalues of TT to be zero.


Let me know if you'd like further clarification or additional details. Here are five related questions for practice:

  1. How does the field characteristic affect the trace function?
  2. What is the significance of nilpotency in linear algebra and matrix theory?
  3. Can you generalize the proof to fields of nonzero characteristic?
  4. What role does the Vandermonde matrix play in this proof?
  5. How would this proof change if the trace condition were only for finitely many ii?

Tip: When proving nilpotency, analyze both eigenvalues and minimal polynomials—they often reveal the underlying structure of the operator.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Linear Algebra
Trace of a Linear Operator
Nilpotent Operators
Eigenvalues

Formulas

tr(T^i) = λ_1^i + λ_2^i + ... + λ_n^i
Nilpotency: T^m = 0

Theorems

Trace Cyclic Invariance
Minimal Polynomial
Vandermonde Determinant

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate Mathematics (Linear Algebra or Abstract Algebra)