Math Problem Statement
In perceptron criterion, sequential update of weight vector
a) requires more memory space compared to taking all the samples together.
b) requires less memory space compared to taking all the samples together.
c) requires same memory space when taking all the samples together.
a)
b)
d) None of the above mentioned.
Oc)
Od)
1 point
Which of the following statement is true for perceptron criterion?
a) Convergence is always guaranteed..
b) Convergence is guaranteed for linearly separable classes.
c) Both a and b.
d) None of the above mentioned.
Oa)
Solution
Let's break down the two questions step by step.
Question 1:
In the Perceptron Criterion, we are talking about how the weight vector is updated during the training process, specifically comparing sequential updates (updating weights after each sample) to batch updates (updating weights after seeing all the samples).
Options:
- a) Sequential update requires more memory compared to taking all the samples together.
- b) Sequential update requires less memory compared to taking all the samples together.
- c) Sequential update requires the same memory space as taking all the samples together.
- d) None of the above.
Answer: b) Sequential update requires less memory compared to taking all the samples together.
- Reasoning: In sequential updating, weights are adjusted after each sample, which means the perceptron only needs to hold one sample in memory at a time. Batch updates, on the other hand, require holding all samples in memory simultaneously, thus consuming more memory.
Question 2:
Regarding Convergence of the Perceptron Algorithm, the convergence depends on whether the data is linearly separable.
Options:
- a) Convergence is always guaranteed.
- b) Convergence is guaranteed for linearly separable classes.
- c) Both a and b.
- d) None of the above.
Answer: b) Convergence is guaranteed for linearly separable classes.
- Reasoning: The Perceptron Algorithm converges (i.e., finds a solution) if and only if the data is linearly separable. If the data is not linearly separable, the perceptron will not converge, and the algorithm will continue running indefinitely.
Let me know if you'd like more details or have any further questions. Here are some additional practice questions related to this topic:
- How does the learning rate affect the convergence of the perceptron algorithm?
- Can the perceptron algorithm classify non-linearly separable data?
- What modifications can be made to the perceptron algorithm to handle non-linearly separable data?
- How does the perceptron learning algorithm handle noisy data?
- What is the impact of misclassified points on the perceptron algorithm’s weight update?
Tip: The Perceptron algorithm assumes that data is linearly separable. When it's not, techniques like the kernel trick (used in SVMs) are often applied to handle complex boundaries.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Perceptron Criterion
Linear Separability
Memory Complexity
Formulas
-
Theorems
Perceptron Convergence Theorem
Suitable Grade Level
University Level
Related Recommendation
Sequential Weight Vector Update in Perceptron Algorithm: Memory Space Considerations
Perceptron Weight Update Rule with Gradient Descent
Perceptron vs Relaxation Criterion: Misclassification Probabilities
Understanding Relaxation Criterion in Perceptron Algorithms for Linear and Nonlinear Separable Classes
How to Apply the Sign Activation Function in a Perceptron