Math Problem Statement
- The value, V, of the MegaCash company is modeled by 2 . 4 2 2 . 0 2 t t V , where V is measured in millions of dollars and t is measured in years, with t=0 in the year 2000. (a) What was the value of the company in 2002? (b) In what year(s) did the value of the company equal 1 million dollars? (c) Between what years did the company have to borrow money in order to survive?
Solution
The function that models the value of MegaCash company is given as:
Where is in millions of dollars, and is the number of years since 2000, i.e., corresponds to the year 2000.
Let’s break down the questions:
(a) What was the value of the company in 2002?
To find the value in 2002, we need to substitute (because 2002 is 2 years after 2000) into the equation.
So, the value of the company in 2002 was 7.56 million dollars.
(b) In what year(s) did the value of the company equal 1 million dollars?
To find when the value of the company was 1 million dollars, set and solve for :
Rearrange the equation:
Now, solve this quadratic equation using the quadratic formula:
Since the discriminant is negative (), there are no real solutions, meaning the value of the company never equals 1 million dollars. Hence, there are no solutions for when .
(c) Between what years did the company have to borrow money in order to survive?
The company would need to borrow money if its value drops below 0, as it cannot operate at a loss.
To find when the value of the company was less than 0, we solve the inequality:
First, solve the corresponding quadratic equation to find the critical points:
Use the quadratic formula:
Again, the discriminant is negative, which means there are no real solutions. Since the quadratic does not cross the t-axis, the value of the company never goes below 0. Hence, the company never needed to borrow money to survive.
Summary:
- (a) The value of the company in 2002 was 7.56 million dollars.
- (b) The value never equaled 1 million dollars.
- (c) The company never needed to borrow money to survive because its value never went below 0.
Let me know if you'd like further details or explanations!
Here are some related questions to deepen your understanding:
- What happens to the value of the company as time progresses (large )?
- How does the quadratic function behave when the coefficient of changes?
- What are the effects of changing the constant term in a quadratic function like this?
- Can the function represent real-world situations in which growth is bounded (like market saturation)?
- How do you interpret the negative discriminant in quadratic equations?
Tip: When solving quadratic equations with negative discriminants, it means there are no real solutions, and thus, the equation has no real roots (no x-intercepts).
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Quadratic Functions
Algebra
Solving Quadratic Equations
Inequalities
Formulas
Quadratic equation formula: ax^2 + bx + c = 0
Quadratic formula: t = (-b ± √(b^2 - 4ac)) / 2a
Theorems
Quadratic formula
Discriminant (Δ) analysis for real solutions
Inequality solving
Suitable Grade Level
Grades 9-11
Related Recommendation
MegaCash Company Value: Quadratic Equation Problem and Solutions
Interpreting a Quadratic Equation for Stock Price Prediction
Solve Profit Maximization Using a Quadratic Equation
Maximizing Profit with a Quadratic Equation: y = −x^2 + 75x − 636
Maximizing Revenue in Real Estate: Solving a Quadratic Equation