Math Problem Statement
show that imaginary part of z is not differentiable at z=0
Solution
Let , where with real. That is,
Step 1: Compute the Cauchy-Riemann Equations
For , we define
The Cauchy-Riemann equations state that for to be holomorphic (complex differentiable), the partial derivatives must satisfy:
Computing these derivatives,
The first equation holds, but the second equation
is false.
Step 2: Conclusion
Since the Cauchy-Riemann equations are not satisfied at any point, particularly at , is not differentiable at or anywhere in .
Would you like a graphical explanation of this result?
Related Questions
- What are the Cauchy-Riemann equations, and why are they necessary for differentiability?
- Can a function be continuous but not differentiable in the complex plane?
- What are some examples of non-holomorphic functions in complex analysis?
- Is the real part of differentiable at ?
- How does the concept of complex differentiability differ from real differentiability?
Tip: A function can be differentiable in the real sense (i.e., partial derivatives exist), but it might still fail to be differentiable in the complex sense if the Cauchy-Riemann equations are not satisfied.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Complex Analysis
Cauchy-Riemann Equations
Differentiability in Complex Plane
Formulas
f(z) = Im(z)
Cauchy-Riemann Equations: ∂u/∂x = ∂v/∂y, ∂u/∂y = -∂v/∂x
Theorems
Cauchy-Riemann Equations
Differentiability in Complex Plane
Suitable Grade Level
University Level (Undergraduate)
Related Recommendation
Proving the Non-Existence of d/dz (z^2 zbar) Using Complex Analysis
C-R Equations and Non-Existence of Derivative for f(z)=(z bar)/|z|
Complex Differentiability of f(z) = |z| on the Unit Circle
Differentiability of f(z) = z |z| at z = 0 in Complex Analysis
Demonstration that f(z)=z^2 is Not Conformal at z=0