Let's break these down in relation to a base statement, which we can assume to be:

Base statement (P → Q): "I eat what I see."

Now, we will identify the negation, converse, inverse, contrapositive, or none of the above for each statement.

1. I don't eat what I don't see.

• This is the contrapositive of the original statement (¬Q → ¬P).
• Answer: 4

2. I eat what I see.

• This is the original statement, so it's none of the above.
• Answer: 5

3. I eat what I don't see.

• This is not a negation, converse, inverse, or contrapositive of the base statement. It's simply a new statement that doesn't correspond to any of the forms listed.
• Answer: 5

4. I don't eat anything I see.

• This is the negation of the original statement (¬P → Q).
• Answer: 1

5. I don't see everything I eat.

• This is unrelated to the logical forms of the base statement (it introduces a different subject), so it's none of the above.
• Answer: 5

6. I don't see what I eat.

• This is the converse of the contrapositive, and effectively an inverse (¬P → ¬Q).
• Answer: 3

Let me know if you'd like further clarification or have questions about this topic!

---

Here are 5 related questions to deepen your understanding:

1. What is the contrapositive of the statement "If it rains, then I stay inside"?
2. How do the inverse and contrapositive differ in logical structure?
3. Can a statement's negation be logically equivalent to its contrapositive?
4. What happens to the truth value of a statement when you take the converse?
5. Can you find an everyday example of an inverse statement?

Tip: When converting between logical forms like the converse or contrapositive, remember that the contrapositive always retains the truth value of the original statement!