Math Problem Statement
can you write this to the correct significance level 2.58×10-23 ± 2.63 ×10-24
Solution
To express the given value with the correct significance level, we need to adjust the precision of both the main value and the uncertainty to match the least precise figure.
Here's the breakdown:
- The main value is (with 3 significant figures).
- The uncertainty is (with 3 significant figures).
Since the uncertainty is the least precise number, we need to round the main value to the same number of significant figures as the uncertainty (3 significant figures).
Thus, the correctly expressed value would be:
This is already expressed to the correct significant figures as both the main value and uncertainty have 3 significant figures.
Let me know if you'd like more details or have any further questions!
Here are 5 related questions:
- How do you determine the number of significant figures in a measurement?
- What is the difference between absolute and relative uncertainty?
- How do you round numbers to the correct number of significant figures?
- What is the importance of maintaining consistent precision when reporting values?
- How can uncertainty in measurements affect the interpretation of scientific data?
Tip: Always match the number of significant figures in your measurement to the least precise value in the calculation or measurement set.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Significant Figures
Uncertainty in Measurements
Formulas
Rounding to significant figures
Theorems
-
Suitable Grade Level
Grades 9-12
Related Recommendation
Understanding Measurement Uncertainty: 45.39 ± 0.68 m/s^2
Calculating Uncertainty: 1/2 of 0.1 in Measurements
Calculate Absolute and Relative Uncertainty, Mean, Range, and Room Temperature
Calculate Standard Deviation and Uncertainty for Values Set: 1.98, 1.99, 2.00, 2.02, 2.19
How to Report Scale Readings with Uncertainty of ±0.005 grams