Math Problem Statement
In this exercise we will arrive at a composite formula for the trapezoidal rule, and study its error. We first divide the interval [π, π] into π segments, each of length β = 1/π, and set π₯_π = πβ,π = 0, . . . , π. a) Show that the composite trapezoidal rule takes the form π_π [π ] (π, π) = βοΈ^πβ1 _ π=0 π [π ] (π₯_π, π₯_π+1) = β/2(π (π₯_0) + π (π₯_π)) + ββοΈ^πβ1 _π=1 π (π₯_π).
Solution
To derive the composite formula for the trapezoidal rule and show that it takes the form:
[ T_n[f](a, b) = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} T[f](x_i, x_{i+1}) = \frac{h}{2}(f(x_0) + f(x_n)) + h \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} f(x_i), ]
we need to consider how the trapezoidal rule is applied to the interval which is divided into segments.
Step-by-step Solution:
-
Divide the Interval into Subintervals:
The interval is divided into segments, each of length . The points of division are denoted by:
The first point is and the last point is .
-
Apply the Trapezoidal Rule on Each Subinterval:
The trapezoidal rule for approximating the integral of a function over a small subinterval is given by:
This formula uses the fact that the area under the curve on the interval can be approximated by the area of a trapezoid with base and heights and .
-
Sum the Contributions Over All Subintervals:
The composite trapezoidal rule sums up the contributions from all subintervals:
[ T_n[f](a, b) = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} T[f](x_i, x_{i+1}). ]
Substituting the formula for gives:
This can be rewritten as:
-
Combine Terms to Simplify the Expression:
Notice that each appears twice in the sums above, except for and which only appear once (at the beginning and end). Therefore, we can combine terms as follows:
-
Factor Out the Constants to Get the Desired Form:
This simplifies to:
And this is the desired formula for the composite trapezoidal rule.
Conclusion:
The composite trapezoidal rule approximates the integral of over the interval by summing up the areas of trapezoids over each subinterval. The derived formula is:
This formula is used to estimate the definite integral of over using subintervals.
Would you like more details or have any specific questions?
Related Questions:
- What is the error term for the composite trapezoidal rule?
- How does the composite trapezoidal rule differ from Simpson's rule?
- What happens to the accuracy of the trapezoidal rule as increases?
- How can we derive the trapezoidal rule for unequal intervals?
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of using the trapezoidal rule compared to other numerical integration methods?
Tip: The error in the trapezoidal rule is proportional to the square of the width of the intervals, . Reducing the interval width by increasing improves the accuracy significantly.
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Numerical Integration
Composite Trapezoidal Rule
Calculus
Formulas
Composite Trapezoidal Rule: T_n[f](a, b) = (h/2)(f(x_0) + f(x_n)) + h * Ξ£(f(x_i), i=1 to n-1)
Interval Division: h = (b - a)/n
Trapezoidal Rule for subinterval: T[f](x_i, x_{i+1}) = (h/2) * (f(x_i) + f(x_{i+1}))
Theorems
Trapezoidal Rule Error Analysis
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Suitable Grade Level
Undergraduate (Calculus, Numerical Methods)
Related Recommendation
Estimating Integrals Using the Trapezoidal Rule and Error Bounds
Optimizing Trapezoidal Rule for Numerical Integration
Numerical Integration Using Trapezoidal Rule and Romberg's Method
Numerical Integration Accuracy for Trapezoidal, Midpoint, and Simpson's Rules
Derivation of Trapezoidal Method with Truncation Error