Math Problem Statement

A statistician obtains these two AIC scores from two regression models in R. Note the models have the same Y variable and sample size. The residual checks look fine for both models.

Which statement below is correct?

AIC(Model1)

[1] 855.2909

AIC(Model2)

[1] 853.3227

The statistician should choose Model 2 as the best model to explain Y.

The statistician should choose Model 1 as the best model to explain Y.

A higher value of the AIC in Model 1 indicates "underfitting."

The statistician can use the AIC to check if the residuals meet the criterion of being random and independent.

Solution

To determine the correct statement, let's review the concept of AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) and how it’s used to compare models.

AIC Overview:

The AIC is a measure of the relative quality of a statistical model for a given set of data. Lower AIC values indicate a better-fitting model, considering both the goodness of fit and the complexity (penalizing overfitting). Specifically, AIC is calculated as: AIC=2k2ln(L)AIC = 2k - 2\ln(L) Where:

  • kk is the number of estimated parameters in the model.
  • LL is the likelihood of the model.

When comparing two models, the model with the lower AIC is considered to be better because it indicates a better balance between fit and complexity.

Analyzing the AIC Values:

Given:

  • Model 1: AIC = 855.2909
  • Model 2: AIC = 853.3227

Since Model 2 has a lower AIC value, it suggests that Model 2 is the better model when compared to Model 1 for explaining the dependent variable YY.

Evaluating the Options:

  1. "The statistician should choose Model 2 as the best model to explain Y."

    • Correct: Since Model 2 has the lower AIC, it is the better model in terms of fitting the data and avoiding overfitting.
  2. "The statistician should choose Model 1 as the best model to explain Y."

    • Incorrect: This is the opposite of the correct choice. Model 1 has a higher AIC, meaning it’s less optimal than Model 2.
  3. "A higher value of the AIC in Model 1 indicates 'underfitting.'"

    • Incorrect: A higher AIC doesn’t necessarily imply underfitting. It just means that Model 1 is not as efficient as Model 2 in balancing fit and complexity. Underfitting typically refers to a model that is too simple to capture the underlying patterns, but AIC alone doesn't make that direct conclusion.
  4. "The statistician can use the AIC to check if the residuals meet the criterion of being random and independent."

    • Incorrect: AIC is a model selection criterion and does not assess residuals' randomness or independence. Residual analysis (e.g., using plots) is needed for checking those assumptions.

Conclusion:

The correct statement is:
"The statistician should choose Model 2 as the best model to explain Y."


Would you like more details on any of these points or further clarification on AIC?
Here are a few related questions that might interest you:

  1. How do you interpret the change in AIC when comparing more than two models?
  2. What are some alternative model comparison metrics to AIC?
  3. What is the role of residual analysis in model evaluation?
  4. Can AIC ever be used for model validation?
  5. How do you handle non-normally distributed residuals in model selection?

Tip: When comparing models, always ensure that the models are compared on the same dataset and using the same dependent variable to make the AIC comparison valid.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Statistical Model Comparison
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)
Model Selection
Regression Analysis

Formulas

AIC = 2k - 2ln(L)

Theorems

AIC for model comparison

Suitable Grade Level

Undergraduate (Statistics)