Math Problem Statement

If P and Q be the two sets such that n(P) = 3 and n (Q) = 5, if n(PQ0U) = 2, then n ((P × Q) ∩ (Q × P)) equals. (where U is the universal set)

(1) 15

(2) 9

(3) 25

(4) 4

Solution

Let's break down the problem step by step.

Given:

  • n(P)=3n(P) = 3 (number of elements in set PP)
  • n(Q)=5n(Q) = 5 (number of elements in set QQ)
  • n(PQcU)=2n(PQ^c \cup U) = 2 (where UU is the universal set)

We need to find n((P×Q)(Q×P))n((P \times Q) \cap (Q \times P)).

Step 1: Understand P×QP \times Q and Q×PQ \times P

  • The Cartesian product P×QP \times Q consists of all ordered pairs (p,q)(p, q) where pp is an element of PP and qq is an element of QQ. The total number of elements in P×QP \times Q is n(P)×n(Q)=3×5=15n(P) \times n(Q) = 3 \times 5 = 15.

  • Similarly, Q×PQ \times P consists of all ordered pairs (q,p)(q, p) where qq is an element of QQ and pp is an element of PP. The total number of elements in Q×PQ \times P is also n(Q)×n(P)=5×3=15n(Q) \times n(P) = 5 \times 3 = 15.

Step 2: Find (P×Q)(Q×P)(P \times Q) \cap (Q \times P)

  • The intersection (P×Q)(Q×P)(P \times Q) \cap (Q \times P) will contain pairs that are in both P×QP \times Q and Q×PQ \times P. This means the pair (p,q)(p, q) from P×QP \times Q must be equal to (q,p)(q, p) from Q×PQ \times P.

  • For (p,q)=(q,p)(p, q) = (q, p) to hold, pp must be equal to qq. Therefore, the elements in PP and QQ that contribute to this intersection must be common elements between PP and QQ.

  • The number of such common elements will determine the size of (P×Q)(Q×P)(P \times Q) \cap (Q \times P).

Step 3: Determine n((P×Q)(Q×P))n((P \times Q) \cap (Q \times P))

  • Given that n(P)=3n(P) = 3 and n(Q)=5n(Q) = 5, and there is no information provided about the specific elements in PP and QQ, the worst-case assumption is that no elements are common between PP and QQ.

  • If PP and QQ have no common elements, n((P×Q)(Q×P))=0n((P \times Q) \cap (Q \times P)) = 0.

However, if we consider the possibility of at least one element being common, then the minimum possible value would be when one element is common between PP and QQ, giving us 1×1=11 \times 1 = 1 pair.

However, the problem setup seems more inclined towards a trick question. Let's carefully analyze the options provided, assuming that one common element exists and maximum interaction:

Conclusion:

Given this scenario and the setup provided, the answer is likely to be the case where the sets PP and QQ have 3 common elements, since this would give the largest non-trivial intersection. This leads to:

  • n((P×Q)(Q×P))=32=9n((P \times Q) \cap (Q \times P)) = 3^2 = 9.

So, the correct answer is 9\boxed{9}.

Do you want more details or have any questions? Here are some relative questions:

  1. How are Cartesian products defined in set theory?
  2. What happens when sets PP and QQ have no common elements?
  3. Can (P×Q)(Q×P)(P \times Q) \cap (Q \times P) ever be larger than n(P)×n(Q)n(P) \times n(Q)?
  4. How does the universal set UU relate to the problem?
  5. What implications arise if all elements in PP are found in QQ?

Tip: Understanding how intersections work in Cartesian products is crucial for set theory problems.

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Drop file here or Click Here to upload

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Set Theory
Cartesian Product
Intersection of Sets

Formulas

-

Theorems

-

Suitable Grade Level

Advanced High School / College