If f(n) = 3n^2 and g(n) = n^2, why in the world would we choose g(n) to upper bound f(n)? that doesn't intuitively make sense.

Great question! At first glance, it might not seem intuitive that \( g(n) = n^2 \) could serve as an upper bound for \( f(n) = 3n^2 \), because \( f(n) \) grows faster. However, this comes down to how we define "upper bounds" in the context of **asymptotic analysis** and **Big-O notation**.

### Big-O Notation and Upper Bounds:
When we say that one function "upper bounds" another in Big-O notation, we're not comparing them on a point-by-point basis, but rather focusing on their behavior as \( n \) grows **very large**. Specifically, we're interested in finding a function that grows at least as fast as \( f(n) \) (or faster) in the long run, up to constant factors.

In this case:
- \( f(n) = 3n^2 \) and
- \( g(n) = n^2 \)

The key idea is that Big-O notation ignores constant coefficients. So, \( f(n) = 3n^2 \) can be expressed as \( O(n^2) \), because for large \( n \), the factor of 3 becomes irrelevant when determining the growth rate.

Thus, \( g(n) = n^2 \) does indeed provide an **upper bound** for \( f(n) = 3n^2 \), because in terms of growth rate, they both grow quadratically, and we don’t care about the constant multiplier in asymptotic analysis.

### Why Choose \( g(n) \)?
- **Asymptotic Growth**: Both \( f(n) \) and \( g(n) \) grow at the same rate, \( O(n^2) \), which makes \( g(n) \) a valid upper bound.
- **Big-O Ignores Constants**: The factor of 3 is irrelevant in Big-O notation, so \( O(n^2) \) still captures the behavior of \( f(n) \).
- **Simplicity**: We generally prefer to choose simpler upper bounds when possible. Since \( g(n) = n^2 \) is simpler than \( 3n^2 \), it's a more convenient and valid choice.

### Summary:
Choosing \( g(n) = n^2 \) to upper bound \( f(n) = 3n^2 \) makes sense within the framework of Big-O notation, where constant factors are ignored, and only the dominant term for large \( n \) matters. Both functions grow at the same quadratic rate.

---

Would you like more details on asymptotic analysis or Big-O notation? Here are 5 related questions to explore further:

1. How does Big-O notation differ from Big-Theta and Big-Omega?
2. What does it mean for a function to "dominate" another in terms of growth rate?
3. Can two functions have the same Big-O but behave differently for small \( n \)?
4. Why is constant time complexity written as \( O(1) \)?
5. How do you determine the Big-O of more complex functions, like polynomials or logarithms?

**Tip**: When using Big-O notation, always focus on the dominant term and ignore constants—they don't affect the asymptotic behavior!

Explore why g(n) = n^2 is an upper bound for f(n) = 3n^2 in the context of Big-O notation. Learn about asymptotic analysis, growth rates, and how constants are ignored when determining upper bounds. Suitable for undergraduate computer science and mathematics students.

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation