Math Problem Statement
2 Asymptotic Notation - Bounds Problem: Let f (n) = n4 + 6n2 + 5. Prove that, for all integers numbers k, we have that f(n) = O(nk) if and only if k ≥ 4. Hint: Because of the phrasing “if and only if” we must prove that f(n) = O(nk) when k ≥ 4 and prove that f(n) ̸= O(nk) when k < 4. Hint: Focus on the cases of k = 4 and k = 3. How can the arguments for these cases be extended to all other k?
Solution
To solve this asymptotic notation problem, we need to prove the following statement:
Statement:
Let . Then, for all integers , if and only if .
This is an "if and only if" statement, which means we need to prove it in two parts:
- (If): Show that when .
- (Only if): Show that when .
Step 1: Prove when
We start by analyzing the function .
Case 1:
To show that , we need to find constants and such that for all :
We have: For large , the dominant term in is , while the other terms and 5 are smaller in comparison.
For sufficiently large , we know that: Thus, for large , we can choose and , so: Therefore, .
Case 2:
When , we need to show that . Since grows faster than for large , we know that: For large , is much smaller than . So, for sufficiently large , the inequality holds. Thus, when .
Step 2: Prove when
Now, we need to show that when . The main idea here is that the highest degree term in is , and if we try to bound it by for , the bound will not hold for large .
Case 1:
Suppose . This would mean there exists a constant and such that: However, for large , the dominant term in is , and we have: Since grows faster than , it is impossible to find such a constant such that for large . Therefore, .
Case 2:
If , the argument is even stronger. The term will dominate even more significantly, and no constant will satisfy for large . Hence, when .
Conclusion
- We have shown that for .
- We have also shown that for .
Thus, if and only if , completing the proof.
Do you want further clarifications on any step or details? Here are five related questions you might consider:
- How does the behavior of asymptotic notation change when has logarithmic terms?
- How can we use limits to formally define Big-O and prove the bounds?
- How would the proof change if had higher-degree terms like ?
- Can we provide a visual comparison of with for different ?
- What are the common misunderstandings with asymptotic notation in algorithm analysis?
Tip: When using Big-O notation, always focus on the term with the highest growth rate, as it dominates the behavior of the function for large .
Ask a new question for Free
By Image
Drop file here or Click Here to upload
Math Problem Analysis
Mathematical Concepts
Asymptotic Notation
Big-O Notation
Polynomials
Formulas
f(n) = n^4 + 6n^2 + 5
f(n) = O(n^k) when k ≥ 4
f(n) ≠ O(n^k) when k < 4
Theorems
Big-O Definition: A function f(n) is O(g(n)) if there exist constants c > 0 and n0 such that f(n) ≤ c * g(n) for all n ≥ n0.
Suitable Grade Level
University Level (Introductory Algorithms or Computer Science)